Lydia Brashear Tiede
The political determinants of judicial dissent: evidence
from the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal

When using the data, please cite to:
Tiede Lydia Brashear. The Political Determinants of Judicial Dissent: Evidence from the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal. European Political Science Review. 20168(3):377-403. doi:10.1017/S1755773915000090
**********************************
***********************
**
*  VERSION * DECEMBER 30, 2013
***********************
*********************************
*#rol_2 is the case number as classified by Chile's Constitutional Tribunal 

*Table 1
*column #1
xtprobit dissent3 concert auth right concrete reform  , i(rol_2)

*column #2
xtprobit dissent3 concert auth right concrete reform if unconst2_decision==0, i(rol_2)

*column #3
xtprobit dissent3 concert auth right concrete reform if unconst2_decision==1, i(rol_2)


*Figure #3
**/pre-reform abstract
*Regression for figure #3 top graph
xtprobit dissent3 auth concert  if abstract==1 & reform==0, i(rol_2)


*/post abstract 
*Regression for figure #3, middle graph
xtprobit dissent3 concert right if abstract==1 & reform==1, i(rol_2) 


* /concrete
*Regression for figure #3, bottom graph
xtprobit dissent3 concert right if concrete==1, i(rol_2)


*** Notes:  April 29, 2025.  Please note that Colombo was coded as nonpartisan for this paper which is different than appears in my book: 
****Judicial Vetoes: Decision-making on Mixed Selection Constitutional Courts (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy) (data for the book appears:  https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/QICBYH)

